Skip to main content


fediblock for racism and slurs - mastodon.arch-linux.cz

Sensitive content

Tato položka byla upravena (1 den ago)
in reply to Domo 🦇

@Domo 🦇 The vile post in question has been deleted in less than 24 hours, isn't this evidence of moderation?
in reply to Hypolite Petovan

anti-roma account

Sensitive content

Tato položka byla upravena (2 days ago)
in reply to Domo 🦇

@Domo 🦇 If you are expecting a 1-strike account ban policy from remote servers then this Fediblock recommendation makes perfect sense.
in reply to Schmaker

As it propably will not federate to you, I'm pasting admins statement

Yes, I am aware of the report and the user has already been contacted. It’s not always possible to respond immediately – not everyone can just sit down at the computer right away. Some of the reports were handled in the morning, and I will finish the rest after returning home.

I take moderation seriously, but running the instance is a volunteer activity that I do in my free time. If any further issues come up, please feel free to reach out – I always review reports as soon as I can.

I don’t understand why you immediately issue a fediblock. Is it really the case that if something isn’t resolved within five minutes, the whole instance gets blocked? I honestly don’t get it.

And honestly - even I do not get what's the problem. Dude acted like idiot, was notified, moderated and makes no problems anymore.

There won't be much #fediverse if people would block each others instances after one rule-violation 😀

in reply to Schmaker

@Schmaker I do understand this drastic measure as self-protection. They just don't want to see any more racist outburst from this account, and if the admin won't ban it entirely, then the instance block makes sense for them. As usual, Fediblock is a suggestion and relies on verification and trust.

You do not have to follow it but also you can't really question the initial intent. The general state of the Fediverse isn't their responsibility.

in reply to Hypolite Petovan

@Hypolite Petovan
Actually I think #Fediverse admins should definitely talk about what measures to take in terms of moderation and federation as long as someone is suggesting blocking whole instance for one post, that was moderated.

Common moderation process on #Czech instances is:
1. Delete post, notify user
2. If violated again, block the user
3. (not always) admins warn themselves if violator registers on different instance

In my point of view blocking whole instance is overreaction as long as it's easy to just defederate rule violator.

In my point of view you defederate instances where bad stuff is tolerated, not instances, where it's moderated - that does not make sense and even though it is meant to be just a recommendation this can make instance appear on some sort of block list between csam and nazis, where nobody checks url after url if they actually are problematic.

I consider this more dangerous than one (moderated) post

JBrickelt963 ✊(φ)🚩 reshared this.

in reply to Schmaker

@Schmaker I do not know OP's specific threat model so I really can't say whether they are overreacting. I do know I won't be following this block suggestion as I see it the same way as you: the racist post was timely removed, the account existence doesn't seem intended to provoke, and their instance doesn't seem to show any additional harmful content in their public timeline.

But I know I'm personally privileged because I can afford to give people like these the benefit of the doubt. Not everyone else can. Additionally, your potential block list scenario seems neither likely nor particularly damaging to me. Just like in real life, people aren't supposed to be able to reach everybody else around. It is one of the greatest strength of the Fediverse, and of course it has its own drawbacks.

in reply to Domo 🦇

fediblock for racism and slurs - mastodon.arch-linux.cz

Sensitive content