Help wanted to design the moderation pages
Hi #Friendica people,
I've started a design document for the upcoming moderation pages that come with adding support for moderation reports by @Michael Vogel . However, I need your help. I'm notoriously bad at keeping focused on writing such a document even if I recognize its usefulness to do things once and do them right.
So please add/edit what you think is missing/incorrect in this CryptPad file hosted by the ever-gracious @Tio
office.trom.tf/pad/#/2/pad/edi…
Cc: @Friendica Support @Friendica Developers @Friendica Admins
reshared this
Marco R.
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Support reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Marco R. • • •reshared this
Friendica Support reshared this.
F00FC7C8 likes to infodump
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Support reshared this.
Schmaker
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • •I'm not sure if it's related to this document (as it seems to me like it is focused on reporting only, not the moderation itself), but somehow i find it important to mention - what will be actual moderation options (and what activitypub and related implementations allows to do).
Just an ideas to consider, you may also don't care at all, feel free to ignore 😀
At this moment we can:
Block user on my instance
It's not clear to me if it just hides user on my instance, or also block for users followers on my instance. Does he keeps read-only access?
Block remote user for everyone on my instance
Delete user on my instance
Obvious
What i think we also should be able to do:
Block user for everyone but his followers on my instance
No more showing in global/local timelines and public comments
Hide user's profile
Mark user as moderated and let visitor show his profile with warning from moderator (similar what Mastodon does)
Warn user
No moderation action, just giant "you have been warned by moderator, if you continue violating instance rules, then your account can face consequences"
Block user's federation to other servers
Sometimes you may want user's content and comments only on your server (or block it for selected server) as they can be controversial for others
Let user comment only his posts
This may be specifically effective against trolling imho
Mark post/comment moderated
Hide post/comment behind warning message
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Admins a Friendica Support reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Schmaker • • •@Schmaker Thanks, these suggestions are valuable, this was gong to be my next design avenue after handling reports.
As a aside, “ Block user for everyone but his followers on my instance” is already available as a console command named “silence-something” (I’m on my phone, will confirm later).
Schmaker likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •globalcommunitysilence
. There's no local alternative but there probably should be.Schmaker likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Admins a Friendica Support reshared this.
utzer [Friendica]
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •Filtrované slovo: nsfw
@Hypolite Petovan I don't get the context, it is not clear what this reply is for.
global silence allows to silence local accounts locally too, I use that for some nsfw accounts that signed up on my server. Silencing them will not show the posts in the community (local timeline), which sometimes then shows an empty page in the community, as it will simply not show the post, but count the not shown posts as posts, so pages will be empty.
@Schmaker
Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to utzer [Friendica] • • •utzer [Friendica] likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
Unknown parent • • •@Andy H3 Thanks! In my experience, making a free form text box required will not make people who did not intend on adding meaningful information suddenly do so.
I know it’s true at least for the “Signup reasons” field Mastodon provides for registration by approval.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Marco R.
Unknown parent • • •reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
Unknown parent • • •Marco R. likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Matthias Moritz
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •like this
Schmaker a OldKid ⁂ like this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Admins a Friendica Support reshared this.
Gidi Kroon
in reply to Hypolite Petovan • • •Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.
Hypolite Petovan
in reply to Gidi Kroon • • •Gidi Kroon likes this.
reshared this
Friendica Developers, Friendica Support a Friendica Admins reshared this.